Compare · Zep

Hunta Gather vs Zep: where each one wins.

Most pages written for the search "Zep alternative" never concede a point. This one does. If Zep is the right memory store for you, we say so below, and we show the rows where we are behind.

Choose Zep

if you need the deepest temporal context graph available today, SOC 2 and HIPAA paperwork now, and a vendor with published benchmarks and analyst coverage. Zep is the enterprise incumbent, and it is genuinely strong.

Choose Hunta Gather

if you need to know what your agents are allowed to store, want isolation you can check rather than trust, and want a price that starts at zero and grows per seat. Bi-temporal is live in its honest form, with the last piece on the roadmap.

Different centres of gravity. Zep optimises what the graph knows. Hunta Gather optimises what is allowed in, and whether you can prove the boundary around it.

Hunta GatherZep
Reviewed writesagents propose, a separate check decides what is storednoextracted facts land directly
Isolation you can verifya signed receipt you re-run yourselflogicalper-project graphs and roles; BYOC at Enterprise; no runnable receipt
Bi-temporalwhen a fact was true vs when you learned ithonest #2history and as-of live; event-time precedence roadmapyesthe reference implementation (Graphiti)
Pinned factsloaded every turn, not left to retrieval×
Graph recallretired by measurementretiredhybrid retrieval returns it
Compliance paperworkSOC 2 report, HIPAA BAA, EU DPADPA on every tier; no SOC 2Enterprise tierSOC 2 Type II, HIPAA BAA, audit logs
Published benchmarksLongMemEval, LoCoMonone yetself-reported
Self-hostyour servers, your perimeterEstate tieron-prem and self-hostBYOC at Enterpriseopen-source server retired in 2025; the Graphiti library stays open
Entry priceself-serve, as of 16 Sep 2026$0, then $25 per seatno seat minimum; tokens metered$125 per month50,000 credits; a 10,000-credit free tier
Zep leads on bi-temporal, compliance paperwork, benchmarks and scale, and we say so. We lead on what enters memory, on proof of isolation, and on entry price. Zep facts read from getzep.com and GitHub on 16 September 2026.

Where Zep is stronger

No spin on these three

Where Hunta Gather wins

Three things Zep does not do

On bi-temporal, specifically

Zep's headline, said plainly

Zep's temporal model is more complete than ours right now. Hunta Gather supersedes facts instead of overwriting them, keeps the full history, and answers what you knew as of any date. Choosing the winning fact by when it was true in the world, not just by when you learned it, is on our roadmap. What we add is different: those facts sit on a write path that reviews every entry and inside an isolation boundary you can prove. That combination is ours.

How our two clocks work today · The isolation receipt · The full comparison, Mem0 included

Verify it yourself

Do not take this page on trust either

The isolation row is the one you can check directly. Pull the receipt and reproduce it offline.

terminal
$ curl -sX POST https://mcp.hunta.ai/v1/admin/verify-isolation -H "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_KEY>"

  schema isolation ......... enforced
  rls FORCE ................ enforced
  per-tenant AES-256-GCM ... enforced
  cross-tenant probe ....... 0 leaks

verdict: VERIFIED
The claim in row two, made checkable.

Compare them in your own tenant.

Start free, store a fact, run the isolation check, and hold us to this page.